# HG changeset patch
# User William Astle <lost@l-w.ca>
# Date 1679004121 21600
# Node ID 1fa6eca684e53752547a472d7cb8c8a50ee8d0bf
# Parent  f12c767c363edee3c487f6797e3b09b9ac440536
Silence spurious warning in lwcpp build

GCC has a stupid-ass warning about snprintf() truncating its output if its
return value isn't tested. But that's the bleeping point of snprintf() in
the first place - that it will truncate its output. Why should I need to add
completely pointless extra code to check a return value *that doesn't
matter* in my specific use case just to shut up an overwrought warning. So
disable the stupid-ass warning.

Why, yes, I do have a strong opinion. Why do you ask?

diff -r f12c767c363e -r 1fa6eca684e5 Makefile
--- a/Makefile	Mon Nov 14 18:01:32 2022 -0700
+++ b/Makefile	Thu Mar 16 16:02:01 2023 -0600
@@ -44,7 +44,11 @@
 CPPFLAGS += -DPROGSUFFIX=$(PROGSUFFIX)
 LDFLAGS += -Llwlib -llw
 
-CFLAGS ?= -O3 -Wall -Wno-char-subscripts
+# The format truncation warnings are bleeping stupid when applied to
+# snprintf() and friends. I'm using snprintf() precisely to prevent
+# overflows and I don't care if the string is truncated, so why should
+# I need to test the return value? Bleeping stupid.
+CFLAGS ?= -O3 -Wall -Wno-char-subscripts -Wno-format-truncation
 
 MAIN_TARGETS := lwasm/lwasm$(PROGSUFFIX) \
 	lwlink/lwlink$(PROGSUFFIX) \