view lwlink/expr.c @ 418:3832a68d83ef

Fix internal compiler error on "var2 = var1 + 1" patterns This appears to be the correct fix. It was provided by Tormod Volden (debian.tormod@gmail.com). The final commit is substantially different from Tormod's submission mostly due to housecleaning (removing the old patches and updating the README). Tormod's comments follow. The original addhi_mem_1 "insn" instruction pattern /matches/ two memory operands, just with the /constraint/ that these are the same location. A pattern match tells the compiler "you should be able to use this, but you might have to work on it to meet the constraints". For typical constraints on registers the compiler can add "reloads", moving stuff between registers or from memory, until the constraints are met and the instruction can be used. However, in this case, no amount of reloads can make two memory locations the same if they already weren't, so the compiler breaks down and cries "unable to generate reloads". It seems this issue only appears if optimization is enabled. The proof is in gcc's reload.c and is left as an exercise to the reader. Limiting the matching pattern to identical memory operands avoids these situations, while allowing the common "var++" cases. References: The pattern/constraints difference is explained in https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Simple-Constraints.html#index-other-register-constraints-3335
author William Astle <lost@l-w.ca>
date Tue, 29 Mar 2016 21:21:49 -0600
parents fdc11ef4115b
children
line wrap: on
line source

/*
expr.c
Copyright © 2009 William Astle

This file is part of LWLINK.

LWLINK is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software
Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later
version.

This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
more details.

You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/

/*
This file contains the actual expression evaluator
*/

#define __expr_c_seen__

#include <ctype.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

#include <lw_alloc.h>
#include <lw_string.h>

#include "expr.h"

lw_expr_stack_t *lw_expr_stack_create(void)
{
	lw_expr_stack_t *s;
	
	s = lw_alloc(sizeof(lw_expr_stack_t));
	s -> head = NULL;
	s -> tail = NULL;
	return s;
}

void lw_expr_stack_free(lw_expr_stack_t *s)
{
	while (s -> head)
	{
		s -> tail = s -> head;
		s -> head = s -> head -> next;
		lw_expr_term_free(s -> tail -> term);
		lw_free(s -> tail);
	}
	lw_free(s);
}

lw_expr_stack_t *lw_expr_stack_dup(lw_expr_stack_t *s)
{
	lw_expr_stack_node_t *t;
	lw_expr_stack_t *s2;
		
	s2 = lw_expr_stack_create();	
	for (t = s -> head; t; t = t -> next)
	{
		lw_expr_stack_push(s2, t -> term);
	}
	return s2;
}

void lw_expr_term_free(lw_expr_term_t *t)
{
	if (t)
	{
		if (t -> term_type == LW_TERM_SYM)
			lw_free(t -> symbol);
		lw_free(t);
	}
}

lw_expr_term_t *lw_expr_term_create_oper(int oper)
{
	lw_expr_term_t *t;

	t = lw_alloc(sizeof(lw_expr_term_t));
	t -> term_type = LW_TERM_OPER;
	t -> value = oper;
	return t;
}

lw_expr_term_t *lw_expr_term_create_int(int val)
{
	lw_expr_term_t *t;
	
	t = lw_alloc(sizeof(lw_expr_term_t));
	t -> term_type = LW_TERM_INT;
	t -> value = val;
	return t;
}

lw_expr_term_t *lw_expr_term_create_sym(char *sym, int symtype)
{
	lw_expr_term_t *t;
	
	t = lw_alloc(sizeof(lw_expr_term_t));
	t -> term_type = LW_TERM_SYM;
	t -> symbol = lw_strdup(sym);
	t -> value = symtype;
	return t;
}

lw_expr_term_t *lw_expr_term_dup(lw_expr_term_t *t)
{
	switch (t -> term_type)
	{
	case LW_TERM_INT:
		return lw_expr_term_create_int(t -> value);
		
	case LW_TERM_OPER:
		return lw_expr_term_create_oper(t -> value);
		
	case LW_TERM_SYM:
		return lw_expr_term_create_sym(t -> symbol, t -> value);
	
	default:
		exit(1);
	}
// can't get here
}

void lw_expr_stack_push(lw_expr_stack_t *s, lw_expr_term_t *t)
{
	lw_expr_stack_node_t *n;

	if (!s)
	{
		exit(1);
	}
	
	n = lw_alloc(sizeof(lw_expr_stack_node_t));
	n -> next = NULL;
	n -> prev = s -> tail;
	n -> term = lw_expr_term_dup(t);
	
	if (s -> head)
	{
		s -> tail -> next = n;
		s -> tail = n;
	}
	else
	{
		s -> head = n;
		s -> tail = n;
	}
}

lw_expr_term_t *lw_expr_stack_pop(lw_expr_stack_t *s)
{
	lw_expr_term_t *t;
	lw_expr_stack_node_t *n;
	
	if (!(s -> tail))
		return NULL;
	
	n = s -> tail;
	s -> tail = n -> prev;
	if (!(n -> prev))
	{
		s -> head = NULL;
	}
	
	t = n -> term;
	n -> term = NULL;
	
	lw_free(n);
	
	return t;
}

/*
take an expression stack s and scan for operations that can be completed

return -1 on error, 0 on no error

possible errors are: division by zero or unknown operator

theory of operation:

scan the stack for an operator which has two constants preceding it (binary)
or 1 constant preceding it (unary) and if found, perform the calculation
and replace the operator and its operands with the result

repeat the scan until no futher simplications are found or if there are no
further operators or only a single term remains

*/
int lw_expr_reval(lw_expr_stack_t *s, lw_expr_stack_t *(*sfunc)(char *sym, int stype, void *state), void *state)
{
	lw_expr_stack_node_t *n;
	lw_expr_stack_t *ss;
	int c;
	
next_iter_sym:
	// resolve symbols
	// symbols that do not resolve to an expression are left alone
	for (c = 0, n = s -> head; n; n = n -> next)
	{
		if (n -> term -> term_type == LW_TERM_SYM)
		{
			ss = sfunc(n -> term -> symbol, n -> term -> value, state);
			if (ss)
			{
				c++;
				// splice in the result stack
				if (n -> prev)
				{
					n -> prev -> next = ss -> head;
				}
				else
				{
					s -> head = ss -> head;
				}
				ss -> head -> prev = n -> prev;
				ss -> tail -> next = n -> next;
				if (n -> next)
				{
					n -> next -> prev = ss -> tail;
				}
				else
				{
					s -> tail = ss -> tail;
				}
				lw_expr_term_free(n -> term);
				lw_free(n);
				n = ss -> tail;
				
				ss -> head = NULL;
				ss -> tail = NULL;
				lw_expr_stack_free(ss);
			}
		}
	}
	if (c)
		goto next_iter_sym;

next_iter:	
	// a single term
	if (s -> head == s -> tail)
		return 0;
	
	// search for an operator
	for (n = s -> head; n; n = n -> next)
	{
		if (n -> term -> term_type == LW_TERM_OPER)
		{
			if (n -> term -> value == LW_OPER_NEG
				|| n -> term -> value == LW_OPER_COM
				)
			{
				// unary operator
				if (n -> prev && n -> prev -> term -> term_type == LW_TERM_INT)
				{
					// a unary operator we can resolve
					// we do the op then remove the term "n" is pointing at
					if (n -> term -> value == LW_OPER_NEG)
					{
						n -> prev -> term -> value = -(n -> prev -> term -> value);
					}
					else if (n -> term -> value == LW_OPER_COM)
					{
						n -> prev -> term -> value = ~(n -> prev -> term -> value);
					}
					n -> prev -> next = n -> next;
					if (n -> next)
						n -> next -> prev = n -> prev;
					else
						s -> tail = n -> prev;	
					
					lw_expr_term_free(n -> term);
					lw_free(n);
					break;
				}
			}
			else
			{
				// binary operator
				if (n -> prev && n -> prev -> prev && n -> prev -> term -> term_type == LW_TERM_INT && n -> prev -> prev -> term -> term_type == LW_TERM_INT)
				{
					// a binary operator we can resolve
					switch (n -> term -> value)
					{
					case LW_OPER_PLUS:
						n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value += n -> prev -> term -> value;
						break;

					case LW_OPER_MINUS:
						n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value -= n -> prev -> term -> value;
						break;

					case LW_OPER_TIMES:
						n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value *= n -> prev -> term -> value;
						break;

					case LW_OPER_DIVIDE:
						if (n -> prev -> term -> value == 0)
							return -1;
						n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value /= n -> prev -> term -> value;
						break;

					case LW_OPER_MOD:
						if (n -> prev -> term -> value == 0)
							return -1;
						n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value %= n -> prev -> term -> value;
						break;

					case LW_OPER_INTDIV:
						if (n -> prev -> term -> value == 0)
							return -1;
						n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value /= n -> prev -> term -> value;
						break;

					case LW_OPER_BWAND:
						n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value &= n -> prev -> term -> value;
						break;

					case LW_OPER_BWOR:
						n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value |= n -> prev -> term -> value;
						break;

					case LW_OPER_BWXOR:
						n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value ^= n -> prev -> term -> value;
						break;

					case LW_OPER_AND:
						n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value = (n -> prev -> term -> value && n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value) ? 1 : 0;
						break;

					case LW_OPER_OR:
						n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value = (n -> prev -> term -> value || n -> prev -> prev -> term -> value) ? 1 : 0;
						break;

					default:
						// return error if unknown operator!
						return -1;
					}

					// now remove the two unneeded entries from the stack
					n -> prev -> prev -> next = n -> next;
					if (n -> next)
						n -> next -> prev = n -> prev -> prev;
					else
						s -> tail = n -> prev -> prev;	
					
					lw_expr_term_free(n -> term);
					lw_expr_term_free(n -> prev -> term);
					lw_free(n -> prev);
					lw_free(n);
					break;
				}
			}
		}
	}
	// note for the terminally confused about dynamic memory and pointers:
	// n will not be NULL even after the lw_free calls above so
	// this test will still work (n will be a dangling pointer)
	// (n will only be NULL if we didn't find any operators to simplify)
	if (n)
		goto next_iter;
	
	return 0;
}